Big Brother and the desert experience

Denise Welch wins Big BrotherThe TV programme Big Brother isn’t everyone’s cup of tea. The prospect of watching a house full of strangers thrown together for a few weeks with very little to do except eat, sleep, do their make-up and talk, doesn’t appeal to all. And the characters, chosen for their quirkiness or likelihood to create tabloid headlines, aren’t always the most endearing, more often instead self-promoting, self-serving, not the easiest people to live with in a confined and highly-controlled space, for any length of time.

But look at it another way and Big Brother is a fascinating experiment in human behaviour, an exploration of how people relate, bond, make decisions, form groups, fall in and out of love, when all that they have to do all day is to focus on that very process and their part in it…..

I got Pip Wilson (who champions Big Brother) and a meditation on the ‘desert’ or ‘wilderness’ experience into my February article in The Lydford village magazine [Big Brother and the desert experience]: with the suggestion that this Lent people consider the parish church available as a real-time Diary Room …

Big Brother and the desert experience

Lydford Parish and Community Magazine

February 2012

The TV programme Big Brother isn’t everyone’s cup of tea. The prospect of watching a house full of strangers thrown together for a few weeks with very little to do except eat, sleep, do their make-up and talk, doesn’t appeal to all. And the characters, chosen for their quirkiness or likelihood to create tabloid headlines, aren’t always the most endearing, more often instead self-promoting, self-serving, not the easiest people to live with in a confined and highly-controlled space, for any length of time.

But look at it another way and Big Brother is a fascinating experiment in human behaviour, an exploration of how people relate, bond, make decisions, form groups, fall in and out of love, when all that they have to do all day is to focus on that very process and their part in it. 

My friend Pip has worked with vulnerable young people all his life and is to me a very wise man when it comes to helping people to unpack their own behaviour and relate to others. Many of the good lessons I’ve learned in how to help people to open up to themselves, others, even in time to the divine spark within, I’ve learned from Pip. He champions Big Brother because, he says, ‘It is people-watching, and this is what I do in real life. Observe people and try to understand with view to entering a helping relationship: and at the same time learning myself! It is great to get to see the real humans emerge as time goes on. Interesting to see masks slip and real strengths and weaknesses visible. Plus there is little else on TV late night when I am slowing up before bed.’

Contestants on the show mature, over time, into people with some wisdom to share about insights they have gained about themselves and their behaviour. Often they will confide to the camera in the confessional ‘Diary Room’ that their time in ‘The House’ has given them space out of their normal lives to reflect on who they are and where they are going. It has been (in terms which some religiously-minded contestants have actually used) a ‘desert’ or ‘wilderness’ experience: a painful but ultimately revealing time of self-encounter.

Many of us have had Big Brother-type times in our lives: whether in boarding school, in the forces, in prison or monastery or package holiday, or in a family home full of people. So we understand what it is like to be thrown together to live in close quarters with others, with no choice but to be there and little opportunity for escape. Some may have found a means for reflection in that situation, in the form perhaps of a diary, or a chapel, or by escaping into books, or even into prayer. And we’ve learned and grown from the experience. The desert, the wilderness, the place of self-appraisal, then, is a hard but valuable place to be.

This is, of course, my invitation to you to take a little desert time, to wander in the wilderness awhile during Lent this year, which begins with an Ash Wednesday service at St Petroc’s at 6.30pm on Wednesday 22nd February. For those seeking a real-time Diary Room in the village, the church is open each day, a place which holds the silent thoughts and prayers of all who have used it for that purpose over the centuries. For those asking questions about life and God and faith there are courses forthcoming, called Christianity Explored and Discipleship Explored, to which all are welcome. Introspection; interaction; contemplation – all add up to understanding, revelation, development. This Lent, allow yourself the desert experience.

Turning water into wine, and blaming the ship’s captain for a disaster

… I also like to think that Jesus performed the miracle of the wine at the wedding at Cana for the sake of the bar staff, the caterers. It may or may not have been their fault that stocks ran so low; whatever, they would have got the blame and took the shame when the wine ran out. Jesus saved them from all that. 

How quick employers are to blame their staff for mistakes: how little time it takes for a shipping company to blame the captain of a stricken vessel for a disaster, and how quick everyone else is to join in the scapegoating. Evidence is not required – just a victim.

This brings us to the very heart of the gospel where Jesus’ crucifixion is the consequence of scapegoating, but Jesus the crucified victim brings the scapegoating mechanism to light for all of us to see; on the cross the scapegoating mechanism dies with Jesus and Jesus’ self-giving generosity reveals another way we can be. That’s the very heart of the Good News. The miracle at the wedding in Cana gives us the first hint of it. 

From my talk today, Intemperate Christianity – the good news.

John 2 – Intemperate Christianity: the Good News

1 Corinthians 12.1-11, John 2.1-11 

Bratton Clovelly, Sourton, Epiphany 3, 20/1/2013 

 

Here’s some good news – the first thing that happened in Christianity happened not in a church but at a party. John’s gospel story of Jesus’ first ever miracle takes place with our Lord not praying in the Temple but propping up the bar. John tells us that the purpose of Jesus’ miracle at the wedding, was to reveal his glory to the world. In consequence, his disciples put their faith in him. 

So Jesus first revealed his glory to the world, not by performing a wonderful healing, not by preaching a stunning sermon. And not by stopping people enjoying themselves. No! He went round the back of the bar at a wedding and boosted the stocks of best wine – by very generous proportions. And thus revealed the real good news in Christianity.

You might wonder why Jesus would be at a wedding in the first place. Wouldn’t he be too busy being holy, playing God somewhere else, to mix with ordinary folks at a social event? In fact, the opposite is true. Jesus learned how to be holy precisely by mixing with ordinary folks – and he taught ordinary folks how to be holy whilst socialising with them. 

We can assume that Jesus was at the wedding because he was invited. A single man of thirty years old is just the sort of person you’d expect to be invited to a wedding, and you can bet, in the close-knit community he belonged to, there would be a young bridesmaid or friend of the bride who would be watching him closely, with interest, hoping he might notice her. 

Was Jesus a good dancer? We don’t know, but we can assume this much – that he wanted to be at the wedding, because weddings are where people are. He wanted to be there to share the joy and the fun of the occasion with his family and friends. Jesus wasn’t an abstainer. 

It’s only what you’d expect – that God who took such delight in creating the world and all its people, would delight to be with them on a day of celebration; that God whose whole being is wrapped up totally in love, would want to share the wonder of a young couple’s love by joining in their wedding party. 

There is another side to this which is also good news in a different sort of way. Because we know from our own experience that weddings aren’t all joy. If we were able to see the wedding party through Jesus’ compassionate eyes then we would know that that dancing bridesmaid was abandoned by her partner only weeks before and is hurting deep inside; we would know that the father buying drinks for everyone at the bar is compounding his financial problems by getting himself further into debt. 

Jesus knows just as we do that weddings bring out family tensions as much as family blessings; Jesus knows just as we do that at weddings some people aren’t there to celebrate stable long-term relationships, they’d settle for a one-night stand; Jesus knows just as we do, that for all the joy of weddings they can also bring out regrets, loneliness and pain. 

And Jesus wanted to be there at that wedding fully aware of all those things. So that he could share in those meaningful little conversations over a drink where people pay attention to each other for once, open up a little and are raw and real about themselves. So that he could put his arm around a sad person, kiss a worried person, dance with a lonely person. Spread his love around. Isn’t that precisely why he came down to earth from heaven in the first place? 

Now the wine – the wine is something else which tells us Jesus wanted to be there and that he understood the people’s needs. When he quietly snuck behind the bar and somehow transformed ordinary water into finest quality wine, three lots of people benefited. 

The partygoers benefited, obviously, although they didn’t even know what had gone on behind the scenes; 

The hosts of the party benefited: it saved them so much embarrassment, there were no such things as all-night supermarkets to bail them out in those days; 

I also like to think that Jesus performed this miracle for the sake of the bar staff, the caterers. It may or may not have been their fault that stocks ran so low; whatever, they would have got the blame and took the shame when the wine ran out. Jesus saved them from all that. Jesus stepping in to replace the people being pilloried for their wrongdoing – this miracle prefigures Calvary, gives us the first hint of the fundamental meaning of salvation.

Now, note that Jesus didn’t just produce any old wine – Jesus’ wine was the very best quality, sending the toastmaster into confusion, making the drinkers feel this was some do they were at, they were involved in something special here. 

And Jesus didn’t spend any time carefully calculating precisely how much wine was needed to keep the party going to a certain time. He didn’t act like a priest does, meticulously measuring the amount in the chalice before Communion. No: Jesus just got all the empty containers they could find and filled them right up to the brim. That should do it, imagine him saying, with a smile, to the flabbergasted bar staff. 

This was more than enough. This wasn’t just generous. This was a scandalously generous gesture. Which is precisely what Jesus intended it to be. Because after all, isn’t the whole thing about God coming to earth scandalously generous? 

Jesus chose to reveal his glory not to a temple-full of pompous priests or pent-up puritans but to a party full of all sorts – isn’t that scandalous? 

Jesus chose to offer everyone, whoever they were and whatever they were up to, the same sort of new life as he’d injected into that party with that new wine – isn’t that generous? 

The disciples saw his glory – and believed. And so can we. This story’s power penetrates through human history. That was just the beginning – the extravagant glory of Jesus is still coming to light in the world now – you might have seen examples of it in your own life or someone else’s. 

The toastmaster said, “You have kept the good wine until now”. This story helps us see that in our lives, the life of the community or the world, Jesus can replace the ‘inferior wine’ with ‘good wine’. This is Good News for all people, in all situations. In the days and years ahead, through Jesus, the hurting bridesmaid can be healed, the debt-ridden father can find financial stability, the regretful can overcome their regrets, the lost and the lonely can find identity in community. 

A final great thing about this story is that it invites us to see how Jesus needs us, to help share his extravagant glory with others. He didn’t do the miracle on his own. He needed his mother to prompt him to do it in the first place. He needed the workers to prepare it all for him. And he needed those disciples to put their faith in him so that his glorious, generous work of love could carry on, spread and grow, through them. 

We are their successors. And that’s why Jesus gives us the Spirit. So we can help share his extravagant glory with others. Jesus gave everyone at that wedding something very good. In 1 Corinthians 12 Paul says that everyone who comes to Jesus will be given something good, through the Spirit, to help them serve God in their lives, day by day. Spiritual gifts, of all varieties, offered freely by Jesus to us. We’re not called to be party-poopers. We’re called to join Jesus at the party. We’re not called to stop others enjoying themselves. We’re called to join Jesus in filling their glasses to the full with the very best wine. 

Now that makes our Holy Communion look a little mean, even inhospitable, by comparison. It’s a long way from looking and feeling like a party. We invite people to very soberly take a modest sip from a tiny chalice. Does the relative meanness of our Communion ritual influence the way we express our faith outside of church? Maybe we should be doing it differently; maybe we should rethink Communion in the spirit of the Wedding at Cana.

You know, God loves a wedding. Because he loves people, loves to spread joy. Think of the deep love of a couple embracing on their wedding day. That’s precisely the sort of love God longs to share with you. It’s not temperate at all. It’s wildly, wonderfully generous. And that is very Good News indeed. 

 

Notes 

[1] This is a reworking of another Wedding at Cana sermon, God’s scandalous generosity, preached at the Good Shepherd, Liverpool, 14/1/2007, and an edited version of John 2 – Intemperate Christianity: the Good News, preached at Bridestowe and Lydford in January 2012.

 

 

Nathaniel and the new vision of God

Revelation 5.1-10, John 1.43-end 

Bratton Clovelly, Sourton, 15/1/2012 

You remember the story of the vision of Jacob: who went out on a journey and that night put a stone under his head and lay down to sleep. And he dreamed that there was a ladder set up on the earth, the top of it reaching to heaven; and the angels of God were ascending and descending on it. And the Lord stood beside him and said, ‘I am the Lord, the God of Abraham your father and the God of Isaac; the land on which you lie I will give to you and to your offspring; and your offspring shall be like the dust of the earth, and you shall spread abroad to the west and to the east and to the north and to the south; and all the families of the earth shall be blessed in you and in your offspring.’ [Genesis 28.12-14]

This story was written on the hearts of the people of Israel, people like Nathaniel in Jesus’ day, and is still written on the hearts of the people of Israel today, because of the promise it gives them of a land they would see as their own. 

Nathaniel would have been impressed by the story of God’s great promise to Jacob because he would have known another story about Jacob – Jacob, a deceitful man, who tricked his brother into selling him his birthright for a bowl of soup. Nathaniel would have been impressed that despite Jacob’s duplicity God chose him to become the leader of a new and great nation: he would carry their name, Israel, into that land of promise.

The story would have impressed on Nathaniel that God sees people differently, and releases them into their great potential. 

In today’s gospel story Jesus teaches us about our ways of seeing. 

We have just heard the story of Jesus and Nathaniel. Nathaniel whose friend Philip said to him, ‘We have found the one who Moses and the prophets wrote about, Jesus son of Joseph from Nazareth.’ Nathanael couldn’t see the connection that Philip was making, it seemed ridiculous to him, and so he replied to his friend, ‘Can anything good come out of Nazareth?’ But when he met Jesus, Nathaniel stopped being sceptical and started to see things differently. 

Nathaniel said to Philip, ‘Can anything good come out of Nazareth?’ and noticing this, Jesus responded to Nathaniel, playfully, provocatively, saying, ‘Here is truly an Israelite in whom there is no deceit!’.

What was going on here? A bit of banter, a bit of wordplay, with a deeply serious intention. The word ‘Israelite’ means One Who Can See God. Jesus’s sideways comment suggests to us that he knew that Nathaniel couldn’t see God at all, at that moment. He couldn’t believe that anything good could come out of Nazareth, let alone ‘the one who Moses and the prophets wrote about’. And: ‘an Israelite in whom there is no deceit’ – a high compliment indeed, for in saying that, Jesus was placing Nathaniel higher than Jacob the founder of Israel, who had been a deceitful man.

Jesus worked Nathaniel out as soon as he saw him talking with Philip. Jesus noticed that Nathaniel was a man with a questioning attitude; a good sceptic, rather like the many, many people in our society today who want to believe in God but have honest and difficult questions to answer first: people who we of firmer faith should enjoy helping along their journey. 

Jesus took Nathaniel’s positive scepticism seriously. And by opening a conversation by making a little joke of it, by being playful and suggestive, Jesus gave Nathaniel the opportunity for a conversation which would open his eyes and heart to the truth of who Jesus was. 

Seeing how Jesus had worked him out immediately, and responding warmly to Jesus’ engaged interest in him, Nathaniel realised how special and insightful Jesus was, and said, ‘Rabbi, you are the Son of God! You are the King of Israel!’ Jesus responded by promising that he would help Nathaniel to see ‘heaven opened and the angels of God ascending and descending upon the Son of Man.’ 

Jesus – very graciously – taught Nathaniel a very big lesson that day. As well as teaching him to see Nazareth in a different way – yes, something good can come out of Nazareth, yes, even the Son of God can come out of Nazareth – Jesus taught Nathaniel something profound about the way Nathaniel should see Jesus. 

‘Rabbi, you are the Son of God! You are the King of Israel!’ Nathaniel had said to him. 

‘You will see greater things than these’, Jesus had replied. ‘Very truly, I tell you, you will see heaven opened and the angels of God ascending and descending upon the Son of Man.’ 

Nathaniel, the Israelite, saw the Son of God as the King of Israel. 

Jesus, the Son of God, spoke of himself as The Son of Man. 

Where Jacob saw a ladder connecting earth and heaven, with angels of God ascending and descending on it, as a sign that God would give the land to Jacob’s people, Jesus invited Nathaniel to see something quite different. In this new vision there is no ladder, but ‘heaven opened and the angels of God ascending and descending upon the Son of Man.’ 

In this new vision it is not a ladder which connects earth and heaven, it is Jesus himself, the Son of Man, who connects earth and heaven. He’s not the King of Israel alone. He is the link between The Father and of all humankind. 

If Jesus was the King of Israel then he would belong to one place in particular and would bring blessing to just that one community. 

But if Jesus is The Son of Man then he belongs to all places in the world and yearns to bring blessing to everybody. 

No-one had known God like this before. A God not tied down to territory, but universal. A God not attached especially to one particular race or people but completely open to all. This is the great truth to which Nathaniel had his eyes opened that day. Nathaniel the sceptic was the first to whom Jesus revealed this great eternal and global truth.

And this is the final and important point to draw from this story. That Jesus also taught Nathaniel a very big lesson that day – about himself. Jesus taught Nathaniel something profound about the way Nathaniel should see himself. It’s a lesson we can draw on as we consider how the sceptical and questioning people of today’s society can have their eyes opened to the great truths about God.

Isaiah, the great prophet of Israel, once had a very negative, despairing vision from God in which God told him about a people who ‘keep listening, but do not comprehend; keep looking, but do not understand’, whose minds are made dull, whose ears are stopped, and whose eyes are shut, so that they may not look with their eyes, and listen with their ears, and comprehend with their minds, and turn and be healed’. [Isaiah 6:8-10 paraphrased]

How like today’s people that sounds. The sceptical and questioning people of today’s society who for all our networked activities, all the sound and motion which fills our lives, for all our Facebook friends and village social activities, nevertheless feel increasingly rootless, isolated and ill-equipped to cope with the difficulties and complexities of life, to find meaning in a world where meaning has been replaced by endless choices.

The sociologist Peter Berger writes that

Modernity has accomplished many far-reaching transformations, but it has not fundamentally changed the finitude, fragility and mortality of the human condition. What it has accomplished is to seriously weaken those definitions of reality that previously made that human condition easier to bear. [2]

Modern people are constantly on the move, says Berger, migrating through a succession of widely divergent social worlds. The modern mind is ‘the homeless mind’, he says, homeless because ‘A world in which everything is in constant motion is a world in which certainties of any kind are hard to come by.’ [3]

This is our story, which we bring to the scriptures today. And in the scriptures we meet Jacob, a deceitful man who nevertheless God chose to start a new, great nation, to become rooted in a land of promise. Notice where Jacob was when the promise came from God: he was homeless, uprooted, on the road. The place where Jacob dreamed of angels ascending and descending a ladder to heaven that night was in a town called Luz. But this made Jacob see Luz in a new way, and so he immediately decided to rename it Bethel, which means the “house of God”. “This is the house of God,” he said, “This is the gate of heaven.” On the road Jacob the exile, the homeless one, received certainty, direction, the promise of a new home.

And we bring our story, the story of our modern society and our homeless mind, to a clearing under a fig tree in an unnamed part of Galilee, to an encounter between people on the move where Nathaniel, the questioner, the sceptic, finds it hard to accept Philip’s words that anything good could come out of Nazareth, but who after receiving affirmation and revelation from Jesus, proclaimed him the Son of God, the King of Israel, and then learned even more.

The prophet John, in Revelation, foresaw that ‘saints from every tribe and language and people and nation’ could, and will, come together in God. This is what Nathaniel saw, in the end, once he’d met Jesus, and had his eyes opened – not a God who belongs to one place or one tribe or one denomination or even one creed in particular and can bring blessings to just that one community; rather a God who belongs to all places in the world and yearns to bring blessing to everybody. In an anonymous place of encounter Nathaniel the sceptical one, received certainty, direction, promise, for his journey.

And this is what the people of our age can receive too, when they have their eyes, their ears, their minds, opened to the realisation that even in a world in which everything is in constant motion, life-changing encounters with the living God are possible, that in Christ there is a land of promise for the exile, that in Christ there is a place of answers for the sceptic, that in Christ there is meaning: that in Christ there is a home for the homeless mind.

 

Notes 

[1] A rewrite of an earlier sermon, Nathaniel and the new vision of God, preached in Liverpool in 1999 in which the emphasis was on Israel-Palestine.

[2] Peter L. Berger, Brigitte Berger and Hansfried Kellner, The Homeless Mind: Modernization and Consciousness, p.166

[3] The Homeless Mind, p.165. This sermon’s conclusion also owes a good deal to Walter Brueggemann, Subversive Obedience: Truth-Telling and the Art of Preaching, London: SCM, 2011, in particular Brueggemann’s interaction with Berger’s work in connection to themes of exile and homecoming (p.46)


Epiphany – dreamers and stargazers

Isaiah 60.1-6 / Matthew 2.1-12

Lydford, 8 Jan 2012

 

For ten months in the year 7BC, Jupiter and Saturn travelled very close to each other in the night sky. The giant planet Jupiter, thick with liquid gasses, circled by moons larger than the planet earth, to the ancients represented the highest god and ruler of the universe: to the Greeks that was Zeus; to the Babylonians, Marduk; to the Romans Jupiter. Saturn with its colourful rings was deemed to be the shield of Palestine. 

 

In May, September and December of the following year, 6BC, Jupiter and Saturn met in the constellation Pisces, which was also associated with Syria and Palestine, and was thought to signify momentous events. To those who followed such stars, the meaning of this heavenly conjunction was clear: a divine and cosmic ruler was to appear in Palestine.

 

To those who shared this star-gazing wisdom, it was clear how they should respond to this revelation: they must set out to find this cosmic ruler, to pay homage, to bring gifts.

 

All we know for sure about these visitors to the infant Jesus was that they were foreigners who were deemed to be wise. 

 

We don’t know how many there were: tradition says three because they brought three gifts, but you know this doesn’t necessarily add up if, like me, you received multiple presents off the same people this Christmas, like a pair of socks packaged together with a Boots gift token. 

 

Tradition says they were men, but their party could have included women. This week a female friend sent me an email which asked, What would have happened if it had been the three Wise Women instead of three Wise Men ? She said that:

 

They would have asked directions…

arrived on time …

helped deliver the baby …

cleaned the stable …

brought practical gifts …

and made a casserole 

 

But, joking apart. women have always been the bearers of ancient and practical wisdom, as scripture shows when we look closely. There’s every reason to suggest that some of these magi may have been female….

 

And we’re in the habit of calling them kings, which they weren’t. There’s a slender chance that they may have been Persian ambassadors, but essentially they were astrologers, soothsayers, divines. 

 

It’s important to challenge the kingship notion because who these visitors were reflects on who we think Jesus was and is. The story of the coming of the magi establishes the credibility of Jesus. The magi offered an endorsement of the baby Jesus, showing that they believed that he was indeed the expected divine and cosmic ruler.  

 

If Jesus’ birth had been accredited by kings, representatives of the military state, his divine rule would seem to be like theirs, a society in which kingship overrules kin-ship and credibility comes through the use of force. Theology embraced the notion of the three kings in later centuries as the church aligned itself with the state, and ceased to be a network of peaceable communities, and started playing power games.

 

We know how kings behaved around the birth of Jesus because we have the account of King Herod, who, sensing that this child threatened his position, consulted, connived, plotted and executed a brutal act of slaughter to rid himself of this perceived challenge to his throne. Like all such kingly acts right up to today, it didn’t hit the target and didn’t make Herod any more secure than he had been before. And dozens of innocent children died.

 

But these visitors, the magi, carried a different view of the world. A different sort of wisdom. And surrounded Jesus with it at his birth. 

 

The main reason Matthew involves these strange travellers in the story of Jesus’ birth was because they were foreigners: they came from outside, they followed a strange religion, they probably looked different, dressed differently, thought differently, sang different songs, dreamed different dreams from those whom they visited. 

 

But Matthew included them for our sake. Because we are foreigners, too, included in the new world order which Jesus brought out of Israel when he came. And the sort of wisdom which surrounded Jesus at his birth is part of that new world order. It can be ours, it can enrich us, today. 

 

The wisdom of the magi came two ways:

 

They found significance in the stars;

They found guidance through their dreams.

 

There are two kinds of stargazers today: we call them astronomers and astrologers. We think of them perhaps as scientists, on the one hand, and quacks on the other. We make no connection between them. One belongs in the realm of space research and the other in the realm of horoscopes and superstition. We’re not very generous to stargazers today.

 

But in ancient times stargazing embraced both science and, if you like, superstition, but it would be more appropriate to call it faith. In the time of Jesus and the magi people connected the physical world easily to the unseen world. And they believed deeply in a God who was at the heart of all things, a creator, an originator, one who kept life growing and who, if you praised him, would bless your crops, bring beneficial weather, make you fertile so your family would flourish. This is why Herod took their words seriously, as presidents and prime ministers also take seriously the words of various spiritual advisers today.

 

And the stars were worth studying for all sorts of related reasons – for their beauty, which strengthened your appreciation of God, for their movements which gave you good insights into the movements of God, and also told you when you ought to plant and when you ought to reap, when you ought to move on and when you ought to sleep. Those who studied them studied life – and knew themselves to have a place in God’s ordered universe. The psalmisty wrote:

 

The heavens declare the glory of God; 

the skies proclaim the work of his hands. 

Day after day they pour forth speech; 

night after night they display knowledge. 

There is no speech or language where their voice is not heard. (Psalm 19.1-3)

 

Such wisdom is hidden today, but not obsolete. And indeed, it is being rediscovered by many people whose unease is growing about the destruction we’re bringing to the planet, and who are looking for gentler ways to live. Those who still appreciate the worth and lasting significance of occasions like Plough Sunday hold this wisdom deeply.

 

Some years back plans were launched to construct a ‘superquarry’ on Mount Roineabhal on the Hebridean Isle of Harris. It would extract anything up to 20 million tons of stone, fifty times bigger than other large quarries currently in existence. The road-building industry would be well served but the mountain would be virtually destroyed. The hole created but the quarry would be the equivalent of the impact of six Hiroshima bombs.

 

When it emerged that Britain already had a superquarry, which has never operated much beyond half-capacity, it became clear to the people of Harris that this application was driven not by real need, but by corporate competition, and they opposed it.

 

The case they made to the Scottish Executive was astonishing because the witnesses argued not just economics and politics, but they used some of the ancient wisdom, the language of the magi, to state their case. People spoke of the specialness of the mountains, not that they are necessarily sacred, but that they are places where life is lived and encountered, where God lives and is present. Places of memory and deep value.

 

A Presbyterian minister talked about the bible’s injunction to us to guard and protect the ground, and asked the inquiry to reflect on whether the superquarry was to the glory of God. 

 

And Stone Eagle, a North American Indian chief who had fought similar cases in his home country, spoke eloquently of the connections between the Creator and creation, about the land which should be shown reverence because the work of the Creator is sacred.

 

After a long and protracted inquiry, the Scottish Executive rejected the superquarry proposal in November 2000. The kind of ancient wisdom which affirmed Jesus at his birth had found a valid voice in a secular court of today. [1]

 

Such wisdom is cultivated by dreams. We remember that the magi found guidance through their dreams, avoiding Herod and returning by a different route.

 

And elsewhere in the nativity story, dreams featured large: God appeared to Joseph in a dream, telling him not to fear taking Mary as his wife, as the baby she had conceived was from the Holy Spirit. After the magi had gone, an angel of the Lord appeared to Joseph in a dream, telling him to take the child and his mother and escape to Egypt, to avoid the slaughter of Herod, and in two later dreams God guided Joseph back home.

 

I suggest that dreaming is rather close to praying. Indeed, if we take the example of people like Joseph the husband of Mary and Joseph the son of Jacob we see that God speaks most clearly and most often through dreams. Perhaps our anxieties about prayer may be relieved by this: we don’t have to do anything except to have an attitude of openness to God so that we’re ready to hear the divine voice, anytime, even, and perhaps especially, when we’re asleep! 

 

Our dreams deal with our fears – like the magi’s fears of their journey home and Joseph’s fears about the future of Mary’s child. God meets us in them if we’re open to that.

 

And our dreams are the places where our hopes take shape. We talk about our ambitions and expectations in this way: what are your dreams for the New Year?  

 

The magi help us here, too, because in their ancient but deeply relevant wisdom they held on to their dreams despite the pressure that the king put on them to do things his way. 

 

So may our prayer for 2012 be that we will increasingly learn to see the world the way the magi did, finding God at the heart of that world, and living in that wisdom; finding God at the heart of our dreams, and holding on to them….. A poem by Paul Cookson:

 

Let no one steal your dreams

Let no one tear apart

The burning of ambition

That fires the drive inside your heart

 

Let no one steal your dreams

Let no one tell you that you can’t

Let no one hold you back

let no one tell you that you won’t

 

Set your sights and keep them fixed

Set your sights on high

Let no one steal your dreams

Your only limit is the sky.

 

Let no one steal your dreams

Follow your heart

Follow your soul

For only when you follow them

Will you feel truly whole

 

Set your sights and keep them fixed

Set your sights on high

Let no one steal your dreams

Your only limit is the sky [2]

 

 

Notes

Sermon originally preached at Holy Trinity, Wavertree, on Epiphany – 6 Jan 2002. Some of the reference sources I’m afraid have been lost and forgotten in the intervening times. 

[1] Alastair McIntosh, Soil and Soul, tells the full story

[2] Paul Cookson, Ordinary Words, p.55

 

At the year’s turning: with Mary, pondering

Happy New Year, reader. I sincerely hope it is for you.

Today's talk, At the year’s turning: with Mary, pondering, owes a tremendous amount to the opening chapter in a small but characteristically powerful book by Walter Brueggemann, Subversive Obedience: Truth-Telling and the Art of Preaching, which begins, 

We might as well concede at the outset that we live, all of us, in a promiscuous, self-indulgent society which prizes autonomy. As a consequence, "obedience" is a tough notion, which we settle mostly either by the vaguest of generalisations, or by confining subject matter to those areas already agreed upon.

How to preach "subversive obedience" into such a society? This is Brueggemann's subject which he tackles with skill and subtle power. If I can get even a modicum of this into my preaching I'll be happy. No prizes for guessing my new year's resolution.