The Gucci olympics and the infinite gift

… Olympic celebrities speak of being worn down by the attention of crowds. India’s Olympic boxing hopeful Vikas Krishan recently said ‘It is good to be unknown.’ The 20-year-old Asian Games gold-medallist told zeenews.com, ‘Too much publicity impinges in the private life of a person. I can’t do normal things which people of my age do. I can’t even talk loudly or criticise somebody because people and media will blow it out of proportion.’ ‘I don’t have many ambitions,’ he added, ‘I want to live a simple and content life’. But Krishan knows that if he succeeds in gaining an Olympic medal then the crowds won’t leave him alone. The crowds crave those who show signs of greatness, the crowds will convey greatness on them, and will follow them everywhere to receive a share in what these great ones have. The crowd craves to make kings of ordinary men.

We know that Jesus 'was moved with pity for [these crowds] because they were as sheep without a shepherd' (Mark 6:34), but they still wore him down. After a long day by the lakeside he felt harrassed to provide food for them; and in one of the most memorable actions of his entire ministry he produced enough bread and fish to feed five thousand. 

 The crowd had seen Jesus heal people, even without touching them, and they wanted more of that. But it wasn't just about healing, the crowd wanting more. They couldn't get enough of Jesus; their appetite for him was relentless; they were addicted; even after eating their fill they wanted more from Jesus – they started to call him a prophet, they wanted to make him a king. They were suffering what Gil Bailie calls a ‘famished craving’. 

The famished craving is our craving for the famous, our focus on those who fascinate us, our craving for the attention of others, a process in which the crowd wavers between being impressed and being bored, always craving something new. 

The Galilean crowds desired to make Jesus a king, this figure who fascinated them for a while. Like celebrities, kings are really sacrificial victims with a suspended sentence, ones who fascinate us for a time, until our famished craving devours them. The crowds turn on those they once made king; like Olympic athletes who age and are soon eclipsed by another, abandoned to drift in sea of criticism. By the end of the chapter, the Galilean crowd has dispersed; by the end of the gospel it has reassembled to devour Jesus.

At this present moment our country is in the grip of an Olympic obsession – is that a famished craving? Or our culture’s driven desire to shop for that one item which will satisfy us – and having purchased that, to need to shop for something else – is that a famished craving? Our need to gain the attention of others; our hunger to be fed, physically and emotionally, is insatiable. 

To be able to post on Facebook photos of oneself inside the Olympic Staduim; posing with the Gucci Union Jack handbag purchased at Westfield. In Stratford, in the world, satisfaction is unachievable. And when we realise this we turn on those we hoped would satisfy us.

But compassionate Jesus gives us more than we ever imagined. … Working from another set of values altogether, Jesus gives an uncountable, infinite gift. …

– From my Olympic offering today, The famished craving. 

John 6: The famished craving

Joint Benefice Service, Sourton, Trinity 8, 29/7/2012

Ephesians 3.14-21 , John 6.1-21 

 

Inside a secured running track at the University of the West Indies, Kingston, Jamaica, Usian Bolt trains, while through the fence a crowd of fans look on. ‘He has the hope of a nation in his hands,’ says one of them. ‘I was hoping I’d get a chance to talk to him. He represents us very well. We all just want him to be very careful.’

If word filters out that Bolt is training there, many students and others soon gather to watch the World’s Fastest Man go through his paces. Reportedly, in exchange for a cigarette or two, security guards will direct fans to places on the fence line where there’s a particularly good view. [1] After Bolt had a car accident, one of these fans sent him a letter. ‘Just want him to know that he’s a voice around the world,’ he says. ‘He’s not just doing this for himself.’

Last month I stayed at the Premier Inn in Stratford, overlooking the Olympic Stadium. Our  elevated position gave us a great outlook on what was then still a work-in-progress. We watched fitters and technicians assembling a BBC studio on top of a car park which had been appropriated for the duration of the Olympics, and we watched crowds massing  through the gleaming new Westfield Shopping Centre, the largest in Europe, built for £1.45bn as the gateway to the Olympic Park. Within the shining designer mall there was a buzz of anticipation: it was like watching a rehearsal for the serious shopping which will be going on there during the Olympics. Westfield Stratford City is designed so that over 70% of spectators will pass directly through it en route to the Olympic Park.  

Imagine the crowds passing through there today, hungry for a celebrity sighting, yearning to touch the glory of the Olympics, determined on their way to visit Prada. I think of them as just like the crowds who pursued Jesus as he made his way through Galilee.

In the gospels Jesus is constantly pursued by crowds, all wanting his attention, all wanting to touch his flesh, holding their hands out, expecting him to feed them. Like fans mobbing Usain Bolt outside a London hotel, the Galilean crowds hemmed Jesus in, wanting more and more, giving him no time to himself, even to eat. Jesus tried to escape them to recuperate. They kept looking for him until they found him again. 

Olympic celebrities speak of being worn down by the attention of crowds. India’s Olympic boxing hopeful Vikas Krishan recently said ‘It is good to be unknown.’ The 20-year-old Asian Games gold-medallist told zeenews.com, ‘Too much publicity impinges in the private life of a person. I can’t do normal things which people of my age do. I can’t even talk loudly or criticise somebody because people and media will blow it out of proportion.’ ‘I don’t have many ambitions,’ he added, ‘I want to live a simple and content life’. [2] But Krishan knows that if he succeeds in gaining an Olympic medal then the crowds won’t leave him alone. The crowds crave those who show signs of greatness, the crowds will convey greatness on them, and will follow them everywhere to receive a share in what these great ones have. The crowd craves to make kings of ordinary men.

We know that Jesus ‘was moved with pity for [these crowds] because they were as sheep without a shepherd’ (Mark 6:34), but they still wore him down. After a long day by the lakeside he felt harrassed to provide food for them; and in one of the most memorable actions of his entire ministry he produced enough bread and fish to feed five thousand. 

 The crowd had seen Jesus heal people, even without touching them, and they wanted more of that. But it wasn’t just about healing, the crowd wanting more. They couldn’t get enough of Jesus; their appetite for him was relentless; they were addicted; even after eating their fill they wanted more from Jesus – they started to call him a prophet, they wanted to make him a king. They were suffering what Gil Bailie calls a ‘famished craving’. 

The famished craving is our craving for the famous, our focus on those who fascinate us, our craving for the attention of others, a process in which the crowd wavers between being impressed and being bored, always craving something new. 

The Galilean crowds desired to make Jesus a king, this figure who fascinated them for a while. Like celebrities, kings are really sacrificial victims with a suspended sentence, ones who fascinate us for a time, until our famished craving devours them. The crowds turn on those they once made king; like Olympic athletes who age and are soon eclipsed by another, abandoned to drift in sea of criticism. By the end of the chapter, the Galilean crowd has dispersed; by the end of the gospel it has reassembled to devour Jesus. [3]

At this present moment our country is in the grip of an Olympic obsession – is that a famished craving? Or our culture’s driven desire to shop for that one item which will satisfy us – and having purchased that, to need to shop for something else – is that a famished craving? Our need to gain the attention of others; our hunger to be fed, physically and emotionally, is insatiable. 

To be able to post on Facebook photos of oneself inside the Olympic Staduim; posing with the Gucci Union Jack handbag purchased at Westfield. In Stratford, in the world, satisfaction is unachievable. And when we realise this we turn on those we hoped would satisfy us.

But compassionate Jesus gives us more than we ever imagined. Jesus makes a gesture which shows that he longs to remove us from our world of craving. Jesus doesn’t give the crowds what they crave. Jesus gives far more than anyone could imagine or expect. Jesus gives them twelve baskets full to overflowing. Working from another set of values altogether, Jesus gives an uncountable, infinite gift.

Our famished craving comes in a world of scarcity – where there are finite limits on how much humans can do for each other.

Jesus invites us to step into a world of abundance – where there is no limit at all on how much our compassionate God can do for us.

Our world of scarcity produces systems in which most people suffer: whether the peasant farmers of Jesus’ time, or dairy farmers on the receiving end of harsh economics today. Our world of scarcity is a world of inequality. And studies have shown how those nations with the greatest inequality are also those with the worst health. In the words of David Cameron, ‘Among the richest countries, it’s the more unequal ones that do worse according to almost every quality-of-life indicator.’ And Ed Miliband has said: ‘I do believe this country is too unequal and the gap between rich and poor doesn’t just harm the poor, it harms us all.’ [4]

At Stratford those who shop in Westfield’s branch of Liberty are separated by an invisible but massive security system from the homeless begging poor outside; they are channelled onto trains so never rub shoulders with local residents in a district (Newham) which has the highest unemployment rate in London. [5]

So how can we turn from the famished craving to trust in God’s abundance? In his letter to the Ephesians Paul models a way. ‘I bow my knees before the Father’, he says. Interesting that those celebrities and kings who we crave, we resist bowing our knees to them – we resist offering our complete submission to them. We pursue them helplessly but we hold something back for that time when we will lose interest in them and move on to another. But Paul invites us to bow our knees before the Father – to give our all to God. To devote ourselves to God in prayer.

And what does Paul pray? He prays – a prayer for all believers – that the Spirit of God would strengthen our inner being with power through his Spirit, and that Christ may dwell in our hearts through faith, as we are rooted and grounded in love. And he prays a prayer which speaks explicitly to the crowds in their famished craving, addresses directly our world of scarcity – as it announces the good news of Jesus’ world of abundance:

I pray that you may have the power to comprehend, with all the saints, what is the breadth and length and height and depth, and to know the love of Christ that surpasses knowledge, so that you may be filled with all the fullness of God.

May this be our prayer for our world – that we may have compassion for these crowds who are as sheep without a shepherd. 

May this be our prayer for ourselves, in our famished focus on those who fascinate us, in our craving for the attention of others – that we might learn to  leave that world behind and focus on God; whose provision for us is abundant, infinite and eternal. To conclude as Paul concluded Ephesians Chapter Three: 

Now to him who by the power at work within us is able to accomplish abundantly far more than all we can ask or imagine, to him be glory in the church and in Christ Jesus to all generations, for ever and ever. Amen. 

 

Notes

[1] Bolt can’t forget roots on the fast track to fame; The Associated Press/ESPN

[2] It’s better to be unknown: Vikas; zeenews.india.com

[3] These sections adapted from Paul Nuechterlein’s Girardian Reflections on the Lectionary, PROPER 13 (July 31-Aug. 6) — YEAR B which rely especially on Gil Bailie’s audio tape series, ‘The Famished Craving: The Attention of Others, the Fascination for the Famous, and the Need for Faith’. This in turn reflects on T.S. Eliot’s poem ‘Gerontion’, in which which the poet writes, ‘And what [History] gives, gives with such supple confusions 

That the giving famishes the craving….’

[4] Richard Wilkinson and Kate Pickett, Yes, we are all in this together; New Statesman 11 November 2010. They are co-authors of the book The Spirit Level: why equality is better for everyone.

[5] London unemployment highest in Newham; Stratford Today, 20 October 2011

 

 

The famished craving at Stratford International

Last month I stayed at the Premier Inn in Stratford, overlooking the Olympic Stadium. As technicians assembled the BBC studio on top of a sequestrated car park, crowds massed through the gleaming Westfield Shopping Centre, anticipating the serious shopping which will be going on there during the Olympics. Imagine the crowds passing through there today, hungry for a celebrity sighting, yearning to touch the glory of the Olympics, determined to visit Prada. Crowds just like those who pursued Jesus as he made his way through Galilee.

Mark’s Jesus is constantly pursued by crowds, all wanting his attention, wanting to touch his flesh, holding their hands out, expecting him to feed them. Like fans mobbing Usain Bolt on a London street, they hemmed Jesus in, wanting more and more, giving him no time to himself, even to eat. Jesus tried to escape them to recuperate. They kept looking for him until they found him again. 

Though the crowds wore Jesus down he was 'was moved with pity for [them] because they were as sheep without a shepherd'. In a most memorable action he produced enough bread and fish to feed five thousand. You'd have thought that this would have satisfied their hunger: but no, soon after, here they were again, looking for Jesus, wanting more. They couldn't get enough of Jesus; their appetite for him was relentless; they were addicted; they were suffering what Gil Bailie calls a ‘famished craving’. 

Our Olympic obsession – is that a ‘famished craving’? Or our driven desire to shop for that one item which will satisfy us – and having purchased that, to need to shop for something else? Our hunger to be fed, physically and emotionally, is insatiable. In Stratford, in the world, satisfaction is unachievable. But compassionate Jesus gives us more than we ever imagined. Jesus gives us twelve baskets full to overflowing.

– my note for this week's Parish newsletter. Got it in early as my contribution to the Olympic bandwagon.

Flesh it out with Jesus

I begin this sermon with an advisory notice, in the style of a TV continuity announcer. This sermon contains rather a lot of references to flesh.

Jesus fleshed it out – his compassion for people; as he placed himself before great crowds by Galilee, received, taught and healed them. 

Paul fleshed it out – his belief in a God for all people; as he journeyed through the towns and villages of the Mediterranean preaching a gospel of inclusion to the Gentiles.

And we flesh it out – our faith; by what we do with our bodies – where we place ourselves, who we spend our time with, what we do and say to those people. 

What we do expresses who we are; it demonstrates what we really believe. Christianity is a physical religion – we embody God, we flesh out our faith, just as Jesus did. On reading scripture we perceive the character of God by what we see Jesus doing; on observing our behaviour people perceive the character of God by what they see Christians doing. 

To other people, God isn’t who we say he is – God is who we show he is. Think about it. The old Jesus People anthem ‘We are one in the Spirit, We are one in the Lord’ doesn’t say, ‘And they’ll know we are Christians by our creeds, by our creeds’. It says, ‘And they’ll know we are Christians by our love’. And love is something which we embody.

What a responsibility – bearing the beauty of God in our bodies. 

What a tiring task – carrying God’s compassion to others in our mortal frame.

What a wonderful privilege – bringing God’s embrace to others through our flesh and bones.

From today's talk, Flesh it out with Jesus.

 

Flesh it out with Jesus

Ephesians 2.11-22, Mark 6.30-34, 53-56

(Bratton Clovelly), Bridestowe, Lydford, Trinity 7, 22/7/2012

Queen Camel, Corton Denham, Sutton Montis, Trinity 7, 19/7/2015

 

I begin this sermon with an advisory notice, in the style of a TV continuity announcer. This sermon contains rather a lot of references to flesh.

Jesus fleshed it out – his compassion for all people; as he placed himself before great crowds by Galilee, received, taught and healed them. 

Paul fleshed it out – his belief in a God for all people; as he journeyed through the towns and villages of the Mediterranean preaching a gospel of inclusion to the Gentiles.

And we flesh it out – our faith; by what we do with our bodies – where we place ourselves, who we spend our time with, what we do and say to those people. 

What we do expresses who we are; it demonstrates what we really believe. Christianity is a physical religion – we embody God, we flesh out our faith, just as Jesus did. On reading scripture we perceive the character of God by what we see Jesus doing; on observing our behaviour people perceive the character of God by what they see Christians doing. 

To other people, God isn’t who we say he is – God is who we show he is. Think about it. The old Jesus People anthem ‘We are one in the Spirit, We are one in the Lord’ doesn’t say, ‘And they’ll know we are Christians by our creeds, by our creeds’. It says, ‘And they’ll know we are Christians by our love’. And love is something which we embody.

What a responsibility – bearing the beauty of God in our bodies. 

What a tiring task – carrying God’s compassion to others in our mortal frame.

What a wonderful privilege – bringing God’s embrace to others through our flesh and bones.

That’s not to say that we should, at every moment, be actively ‘doing things for God’. That doesn’t sound liberating, even thinking about it feels draining. People talk about compassion fatigue – stresses brought on by doing too much good. Mark’s gospel shows us what happened to Jesus and the disciples when his compassionate activities got too much. They stopped eating, got exhausted, and desperately sought escape.

If you’ve got God in your body then you should look after your body. I’ve got a t-shirt which these days clings rather unattractively around my middle-aged paunch, on which is printed a slogan saying, ‘My other body is a temple’. And I know that I really ought to care more about looking after the body I’ve got.

So when Jesus got tired he sought a place for escape and reflection – a deserted place – where he and his disciples could recuperate, refresh, and in conversation and discussion, reflect on how things were going – in their mission to embody God to the Galilean crowds. This was the place where they could reconsider their mission, contemplate the ways in which they were showing God to others. This was the place where they could flesh out what forms their mission might take from there.

I know that many of us come here week by week with bodies aching a little from living: whether living consciously for God, or more likely and quite acceptably, from simply living. And here we seek a place for escape and recuperation – a place where we can reflect, refresh, and in conversation with each other share how things are going in our lives. We value this time of retreat and renewal, we value each other’s encouragement. 

Occasionally we also talk together about our faith, about how we’re doing with that task of embodying God in our community. Those sorts of conversations we have less often, but when we do have them we are encouraged. Perhaps we should talk this way to each other more.

It’d be fascinating, fleshing out together our Christian witness, considering the ways in which we show the Good News of Jesus to others and thinking of new ways we might enable those who have never heard the good news to do so.

It’d be instructive to discuss how we teach and nurture new believers, how we could better enable each other, as Christians, to grow in our faith.

It’d be valuable to ask each other how we, the church as a body, serve the community in the same compassionate way which Jesus showed. To flesh out how we stand up for what is right and stand against what is wrong in our community, to consider how we respond to God’s call to be stewards over his creation, at a time in the earth’s history where the cries and groans of creation have never been louder, where the aches and pains of creation have never been greater, because of what humanity has done.

Our bodies and what we do with them are often the source of debate and dissent between believers. As Paul strove to help the early Church consider whether the Body of Christ could bear those who were uncircumcised, so today we face equally-divisive debates over whether believers who are homosexual can receive the same blessings from the Church as those who are heterosexual, and whether those who are women in the Church should be in the position to give blessings – as priests, as bishops. 

Paul helped the early believers to flesh out these issues in a way which began with a desire to achieve unity and blessings for all. Regarding the divisive issues of our day, our prayer must be that we find ways to discuss them which will hold us together and build us up.

I encourage you to talk about these things together – about how we flesh out our faith; about how what we do demonstrates what we really believe; about what our behaviour tells others about the character of God.

You know, you embody God’s compassion when you take a cooked meal to a housebound neighbour, when you sit by the bedside of someone struggling in hospital.

You know, you embody God’s witness when you knock on the door of a village newcomer to welcome them, when you spend time with a teenager talking about what your faith means to you, asking them how they see God.

You know, you embody the all-embracing generosity of Jesus when you invite to your home for a meal people from different parts of your community who don’t normally mix, encouraging friendship between people who in some things may disagree.

It’s a responsibility, a tiring task, a wonderful privilege – embodying God to others. If you  shrink from it at times then fear not – even Jesus needed to retreat and recuperate. If you are daunted by the prospect, take heart – this is something we don’t do alone, we do through the help and encouragement of each other.

We oughtn’t be alone in this. If you’d rather make a visit with someone else, if you’re more confident making new acquaintances when there’s other people with us, if you’d rather work with others to organise a meal, if you’d consider joining a campaign or protest if people invited you along, then you’re embodying the body of Christ, you are fleshing out fellowship together.

People notice Christians, embodying God. Some may call you a busybody; you may sometimes feel like a dogsbody; at times you might be treated like a nobody.

But to our compassionate Jesus you are somebody; and as Paul says, together, we are God’s body.

 

Notes

[1] This sermon is a subtle way of introducing the Five Marks of Mission, a useful tool for Mission Action Planning which we actively utilised in the Northmoor Team churches.

 

Herod the haunted

… Herod was clearly haunted by John’s judgements. And after John’s beheading Herod began to hear voices. When Jesus came along speaking like the prophets of old, siding with the poor and exploited in the land, condemning the powerful who cause the poor to suffer, Herod took this as an echo of the words of John. And because the judgements of the prophets and John led to inevitable violent retribution, Herod trembled at what he heard Jesus say.

But Jesus was no ghost – he was a man in history whose words indeed challenged the domination system of his day, who championed the cause of the poor and exploited in the face of the Roman and ruling elites in the land.

But Jesus was not John either – for he didn’t fulfil the apocalyptic scenario John preached: he did not come armed with weapons and fire; he wasn’t the judgemental God wreaking  violence on those who had offended him, nor did he call on such a God. 

The surprise for Herod and for those peasant revolutionaries who aggressively opposed Herod, was that Jesus came peaceably, he came with an agenda which replaced burning flesh and spilt blood with an offer of bread and wine. He came bringing people together around meal tables, people of all backgrounds united in fellowship in ways which had never been possible before. He came proposing a new kingdom, based on love and fellowship. He renounced the violence of exploitive rulers and apocalypse-seekers and showed them all a new way. …

I've been reading Jack Nelson-Pallmeyer's Jesus against Christianity. His thesis – that Jesus rejected apocalypticism and the concept of a vengeful God – demands that Christians reject the idea (still held, according to Nelson-Pallmeyer, by many theologians of nonviolence) that God’s ultimate act will be of retributative violence. My sermon, Mark 6 – Herod the haunted, embraces this dangerous proposal.

Mark 6 – Herod the haunted

 

Bratton (Sourton), Trinity 6, 15 July 2012

Corton Denham, Trinity 6, 12 July 2015

 

Amos 7.7-15, Mark 6.14-29 

 

The haunted king – we’ve seen plenty of those in literature: the ghost of Hamlet’s father announcing ‘murder most foul’, and demanding revenge; Roderick in The Fall of the House of Usher, a monarch ‘assailed by evil things’.

The haunted king – we’ve seen plenty of those in history – King George VI tormented by his terrible speech impediment and the melancholy and dark moods which it caused; Winston Churchill whose successes were closely shadowed by a depression which he called his ‘black dog’.

And today – King Herod, Herod Antipas, client king of the Roman Empire at the time of Jesus and John.

Herod the king was seeing ghosts. He thought that John had come back to haunt him – in the shape of Jesus. As Mark records it, 

Some were saying, ‘John the baptizer has been raised from the dead; and for this reason these powers are at work in [Jesus].’ But others said, ‘It is Elijah.’ And others said, ‘It is a prophet, like one of the prophets of old.’ But when Herod heard of it, he said, ‘John, whom I beheaded, has been raised.’ 

Herod thought that Jesus was the dead man John, returning to haunt him. 

We can suppose that the neurotic king may have been haunted by John since the day that he imprisoned him. Haunted by a guilty conscience, because he knew that John was a righteous and holy man. 

Or perhaps Herod’s haunting began on the day that he ordered John’s beheading. Haunted by a fear that John would come back to condemn him, and to get his revenge. 

Herod regarded John as righteous and holy because the Baptist called people to repent of their sins, including Herod, who he called to repent of his unlawful marriage; and Herod noted that John’s version of righteousness and holiness involved vengeance on those who would not comply. John had preached of one who would come after him wreaking righteous revenge on the unrepentant: who ‘will take his winnowing-fork in his hand, and [who] will clear his threshing-floor and […] gather his wheat into the granary; but the chaff he will burn with unquenchable fire.’ Herod would have identified this with Israel’s   strong tradition of righteous judgement, as expressed by the prophets of old like Amos who foretold that the exploitive King Jeroboam would die by the sword, and Herod would be well aware of the contemporary voices preaching an apocalyptic scenario where on a coming day a judgemental God would wreak violence on those who had offended him.

John’s call on Herod to repent of his unlawful marriage makes him look like a contemporary religious conservative concerned only with the personal morals of people in the public eye; but Antipas also had political reasons to put John the Baptist to death, for Antipas feared the prophet’s seditious influence [1]. We can be confident that like Amos before him John’s message challenged the public behaviour of kings which exploited the common people and impoverished them. Herod Antipas’ power was based on a system of heavy taxation and a shift from traditional to commercialised agriculture, and the poor became poorer under his rule. [2] Herod knew that if John continued to speak against this he could incite the people to rebel – he had to be silenced. 

Though Herod was drawn to the message of John, though he felt the strength of the truth of John’s judgements, to hold onto power he had to keep John out of the public realm, and because of his wife’s grudge against the Baptist, he had to do away with him. 

But Herod was clearly haunted by John’s judgements. And after John’s beheading Herod began to hear voices. When Jesus came along speaking like the prophets of old, siding with the poor and exploited in the land, condemning the powerful who cause the poor to suffer, Herod took this as an echo of the words of John. And because the judgements of the prophets and John led to inevitable violent retribution, Herod trembled at what he heard Jesus say.

But Jesus was no ghost – he was a man in history whose words indeed challenged the domination system of his day, who championed the cause of the poor and exploited in the face of the Roman and ruling elites in the land.

But Jesus was not John either – for he didn’t fulfil the apocalyptic scenario John preached: he did not come armed with weapons and fire; he wasn’t the judgemental God wreaking  violence on those who had offended him, nor did he call on such a God. 

The surprise for Herod and for those peasant revolutionaries who aggressively opposed Herod, was that Jesus came peaceably, he came with an agenda which replaced burning flesh and spilt blood with an offer of bread and wine. He came bringing people together around meal tables, people of all backgrounds united in fellowship in ways which had never been possible before. He came proposing a new kingdom, based on love and fellowship. He renounced the violence of exploitive rulers and apocalypse-seekers and showed them all a new way. 

Just as he had ordered the killing of John, Herod Antipas played an active role in the execution of Jesus, for the message of Jesus was just as politically damaging to Herod as John’s had been. Perhaps more so, for whilst Herod could understand John’s doomsday scenario – both men’s worldview dominated by the myth of redemptive violence – the message of Jesus was of another kind altogether, and the king couldn’t bring himself to his table. 

Herod Antipas fell from power after battles over land, and the Emperor Caligua sent him Gaul, where he and Herodias lived out the remainder of their days in exile. We can only speculate on whether he was as haunted by the ghost of Jesus as he had been by John. 

But if Herod had heard reports of the resurrection of Jesus, and if he had understood the words of Jesus as much as he had the words of John before him, then maybe Herod would have understood that Jesus has no ghost except the Holy Ghost, and is able to call people to join his company even today.

The haunting of John is for those who fear condemnation and destruction for what they’ve done. The table of Jesus is for those who embrace his invitation to eat and drink and enjoy their place in the fellowship of all who know they are absolutely forgiven and unconditionally loved, now and for all time.

 

Notes 

[1]  Josephus, Jewish Antiquities, Book XVIII, Chapter 5 cited in Wikipedia.

[2] Jack Nelson-Pallmeyer, Jesus against Christianity, p.188-92. This sermon is clearly influenced by Nelson-Pallmeyer’s thesis about Jesus rejecting apocalypticism and the concept of a vengeful God, and thus rejecting the idea (embraced, according to Nelson-Pallmeyer, by many theologians of nonviolence) that God’s ultimate act will be of retributative violence.

 

In our village Jesus has no place

… Jesus has been saying, 'The first will be last, the last, first.' But if he thinks we, who have worked so hard for so long to achieve the standing and status we have in this village, will easily relinquish it to the young, the inexperienced, the incomers, then he needs to think again.

We liked Jesus the youth, devoted to learning, devoted to prayer. For those of us who find learning and prayer difficult he seemed to be acting for us, on our behalf, living out his life that way. We appreciated and accepted him when he was our devout young carpenter.

But we don’t like Jesus the teacher, whose teachings seem to directly attack the way we are. We don’t want to be told how to live alongside others in this village; we don’t want our ways challenged. We don’t want to change our ways. We certainly don’t want to have to think about reaching out with all our heart and energy to those we dislike or don’t know. We don’t want to sit at Jesus’ feet to learn from him how we can heal old wounds and make a fresh start in relationships gone sour. 

If that’s what Jesus wants from us then we don’t want him here any more. He’s got no place in this village any more because in this village we don’t do things his way, we refuse to learn how to do things his way. His word is an offence to us. We’ll carry on the same old way without him. We’ll carry on with our family lives and social lives, our attendence at public worship, our civic lives, just as we always have. And having dismissed Jesus, no-one need know that we ever knew him.

The conclusion of my talk yesterday, In our village Jesus has no place, which melded the events in Nazareth in Mark 6.1-13 with everyday life in everyday England, and was designed to chill. 

 

Let us spray

    Let us sprayLet us spray
    For we know no other way to travel 
    than the wet road way

    Let us spray
    Let us aquaplane 
    Let us thrash our wheels through a wash
    of wicked water
    Let us squint through a screen of grey

    Let us spray
    Though we endanger 
    Our companions on the sluicing skid-surface
    Let us spray
    between their dazzling foglights
    and their indistinct headlights
    Let us spray 
    through the terror of dabbed brakelights
    and the torment of the torrent
    Let us spray

    O blackened cloud protect us
    Let us spray
    O dreadful deluge purge us
    Let us spray
    O glassy tarmac shift us
    Let us spray

Until I got to the reading the other night and received my copy of the book, I'd forgotten that I'd also contributed some motorway poems to In the Company of Ghosts. I had fun starting my presentation with the above, which I first blogged in 2008 after a wet day on the M62.