Bartimaeus – Believing is seeing

Believing is seeing. What we believe influences how we perceive the world. It’s important that we understand how this works.

Do we believe – as the pious people of Jericho believed – that people in our society in similar positions to Bartimaeus have only themselves to blame for their poverty? Believing this, then, do we perceive that we can treat them as untouchables, and leave them to sort out their problems alone, without our care or intervention?

Or do we believe – as Bartimaeus himself came to believe – the good news that ‘Blessed are the poor… for theirs is the kingdom of God’? [5] And so perceive that we should reach out to them, practically, financially, engage with their issues politically, to show them that they are indeed in God’s care and embrace?

 - from today's talk, Bartimaeus – Believing is seeing (2015).

Bartimaeus – Believing is seeing (2015)

Psalm 126, Mark 10.46-52

West Camel Methodist Church, Last Sunday after Trinity (Proper 25), 25/10/2015

 

‘My teacher, let me see again.’

‘Go; your faith has made you well.’

We often hear the expression, seeing is believing. It’s something we all understand, but we people of faith resist it. Seeing is believing tends to be used to support a scientific, materialistic vision of life, in which the only things which are real to us are those things which are visible, or quantifiable, or provable. And it tends to exclude those vast areas of human experience which may be invisible but are just as real to us – the emotional, the mental, the spiritual.

Seeing is believing? The story of Jesus’ encounter with Bartimaeus turns that expression on its head and shows us another way. For Bartimaeus teaches us that believing is seeing.

Believing is seeing. Viewing life through the eyes of faith opens out a very different perspective.

Believing is seeing. The believer is one whose eyes are opened to the world in a whole new way.

Believing is seeing. You don’t even need the use of your eyes to know this.

For the blind beggar Bartimaeus, believing was seeing. 

Even before the two men met, by faith, Bartimaeus ‘saw’ that Jesus would have mercy on him, he believed that Jesus would restore his vision, he believed he would be healed. He saw his future life in a whole new way.

As we contemplate this gospel story we appreciate that Bartimaeus wouldn’t have simply turned up out of the blue to encounter Jesus for the first time that day. Given what we know from Mark’s gospel accounts about the behaviour of the crowds who followed Jesus around, spreading the news of his healings and his teachings about the kingdom of God, we can be fairly certain that – as one of the crowd – Bartimaeus would have known a great deal about Jesus, by the time the teacher and his disciples came to Jericho. 

Jericho was a tourist spot, the last pilgrimage stop before Jerusalem. And so as a beggar at the gate of a city on the pilgrimage trail, Bartimaeus would have, every day, heard the pilgrims talking about Jesus’ ministry, he would have often joined in their debates about Jesus’ identity, he would have regularly wondered out loud – with them all – whether Jesus’ authority to teach and heal came from God. Street people like Bartimaeus always have their ears to the ground, their deep insights are forged through a combination of hard experience and long conversations with all sorts of people. Bartimaeus may not have had the sense of sight that most others had, but his faith in Jesus was by no means blind faith. 

We can imagine Bartimaeus’ faith being sparked into life by the excitement of hearing about Jesus’ explanations of the kingdom of God, the new way of life which Jesus was bringing into the world. We can perceive how Bartimaeus’ faith had grown in his heart as he realised just what good news the kingdom of God was to him.

We can understand how, believing in Jesus’ teaching about the kingdom of God, Bartimaeus had come to see himself differently. Others, quick to condemn him in his suffering, dubbed him ‘son of the unclean’. Unclean, untouchable, defiled – that’s how they saw him. But Bartimaeus embraced Jesus’ teaching where he said that what defiled a person was not their outward appearance but what came out of their hearts. [1] Believing this teaching, Bartimaeus could now see himself as undefiled, every bit as valued and loved by God as the next person.

Banished to the gate of the city – left outside, the lowest of the low – Bartimaeus came to understand the significance of Jesus’ teaching that in the kingdom of God, the ones considered first in their society would be last, and the ones considered last would be first [2]. Believing this teaching, Bartimaeus could now see himself as in line for greatness in this kingdom of God which had come into the world with Jesus, here and now.

The good news of Jesus never sounded better than to people like Bartimaeus – and at that Jericho gate that day, through the eyes of his heart, the blind beggar saw this.

Believing the kingdom of God had come, Bartimaeus now saw life differently. Society would keep him in his place – with the other beggars at Jericho. With just a cloak to warm his back at night and to spread out on the ground to collect the pennies the pilgrims might toss him in the day. But when Jesus called him, Bartimaeus threw off his cloak, sprang up and went to him. Any pennies he had collected rolled away into the dust. Even before he was given his sight Bartimaeus threw away all he had because – through all that he had heard about the healing and liberating kingdom of God – Bartimaeus envisaged that Jesus would transform him.

And that is exactly what Jesus did. Jesus said to him, ‘Go; your faith has made you well’. As his eyes opened Bartimaeus saw a different world, his view of himself, of God, of life, removed from all restrictions and bathed in the light of Christ. 

Imagine if Bartimaeus had held to the implication in the view that ‘seeing is believing’ – that the way things appear are the way they must remain. Accept your status as a poor outcast, believing that God has put you there. Don’t fight it. Don’t allow yourself to dream of a different way. But no, Bartimaeus believed Jesus when he said, ‘The last will be first’. It gave him a vision of a different future for himself. And he followed towards that light.

By contrast to Bartimaeus, Mark’s gospel is full of blind men; that is, people whose eyes can see but whose inner vision is constrained by a lack of belief – or rather, by belief in something other than Jesus’ kingdom values.

For instance, the two encounters of Jesus which Mark places immediately prior to the account of  his meeting Bartimaeus. First, an encounter with James and John, who wanted to sit at either side of Jesus in his glory. James and John held the same belief that most other people had, that their well-being in life (and even in death) depended on their social status. 

Believing that they needed to be first, James and John saw Jesus – not primarily as a teacher of the kingdom, not as a prophet of God’s new order, not as a saviour – but most crucially as one who carried the power to invest them with the social status they craved. Jesus tried to open the eyes of James and John to see that he was bringing in a whole new way of relating, where ‘whoever wishes to be first among you must be slave of all’. [3] 

The second encounter which illustrates this theme of blindness, was Jesus meeting the rich man who wanted assurance of his salvation. This rich man held the belief that has always been so seductive to religious people, that their eternal well-being depended solely on their following a narrowly defined set of rules, whilst carrying on endlessly consuming and storing up personal wealth just like the next person. The rich man must have begun to question this belief he had, perhaps feeling the tension between following moral commandments whilst feathering his own nest, because he came to ask Jesus about it. Jesus tried to open the eyes of this rich man to see that in his kingdom he was bringing in a whole new way of wealth creation, where one’s riches are gained through giving away. [4] 

Believing is seeing. What we believe influences how we perceive the world. It’s important that we understand how this works.

Do we believe – as the pious people of Jericho believed – that people in our society in similar positions to Bartimaeus have only themselves to blame for their poverty? Believing this, then, do we perceive that we can treat them as untouchables, and leave them to sort out their problems alone, without our care or intervention?

Or do we believe – as Bartimaeus himself came to believe – the good news that ‘Blessed are the poor… for theirs is the kingdom of God’? [5] And so perceive that we should reach out to them, practically, financially, engage with their issues politically, to show them that they are indeed in God’s care and embrace?

In the kingdom of God our eyes are opened to a different view – not just of ourselves and of God, but of others also. Believing Jesus’ kingdom values means seeing others differently. So like James and John coming to see others not as pawns in their power games, as means to their self-promotion, but as people to be served, for the betterment of all. And like the rich man coming to see others not as people to tax and trade with, for personal gain, but as people to exercise a little caring restraint towards, as a fellowship to share possessions with, on the way towards living into eternal values.

Maybe even Bartimaeus could not foresee what Jesus would do with him, once healed with his sight restored. ‘Immediately he regained his sight,’ writes Mark,‘and followed him on the way.’ As Jesus left the last pilgrimage stop before Jerusalem and headed into the city for the final campaign of his world-changing mission, the one he called to his side to walk with him was not a man of wealth and influence; he was not one of the disciples aspiring to share the glory of their Lord. It was this ‘son of the unclean’. 

Jesus could make no greater or clearer a statement to his detractors than what they saw that day – that the dawning of the kingdom of God was coming not in fire and armour and great works of power, it wasn’t even coming in a procession of religious enthusiasts, singing the hymns and carrying the symbols of their faith. No, at the gate of Jericho that day, for all to see, the kingdom of God was coming in a ragged pilgrimage procession of a teacher and an outcast, making their way towards the city to challenge all the social, economic, and political powers of the day, in love and healing. The last had become first, for all to see.

One last word on this passage of Mark’s gospel which is so pregnant with meaning and application for our day and time. In believing, Bartimaeus also saw Jesus differently. His belief in Jesus was absolutely radical – for Bartimaeus was the only person in the gospel of Mark to call Jesus the ‘Son of David’. The blind man was unique in proclaiming Jesus as a king in Israel’s messianic line. All those disciples, those scribes and pharisees and learned folk in the crowds couldn’t see it. But the blind man could.

The crowds who heard Bartimaeus call Jesus the ‘Son of David’ tried to censor him, to shut him up. To their ears he was uttering something close to a heresy, certainly something very explosive in that time and place. Jesus then called Bartimaeus – not to address the bold statement which the blind man had made, but to affirm his faith and to restore his sight. Jesus called the blind man, and didn’t reject what Bartimaeus had called him – but he clearly distanced himself from it, deflecting attention back to the blind man himself.

Jesus’ reluctance to admit his Godly nature – his determination to keep the ‘Messianic secret’ (as some call it) – is a theme which runs throughout Mark’s gospel, and it has exercised many minds over the centuries. Too little time here to survey every perspective which has been offered about the subject. But just one small suggestion from me for now: that maybe Jesus wanted to keep his Messianic status a secret at that time to allow space for his teaching about the kingdom of God to grow, unimpaired by false assumptions about his divine status.

Jesus seemed to want to show that the kingdom of God had come, not with great signs and wonders in the heavenly realms, but in a small act of healing at the city gate.

Jesus seemed to want to offer the perspective that the kingdom of God was shown, not through displays of divine power of the sort which so motivated the desires of James and John, but through teachings about servanthood backed up by acts of grace and kindness.

Jesus seemed to want to demonstrate that the kingdom of God was not a set of spiritualised promises from a divine body about a heavenly afterlife, but that it meant the activity of God in the here-and-now, activity which privileged the poorest in society, challenging other people’s perspectives towards them, activity which thus transformed human relationships economically, politically, physically. 

Believing these things is seeing the Messiah in action. Strange, but – going back to my very opening remarks in this sermon – this roots the kingdom of God in our material, physical life. If not always visible, or quantifiable, or provable, it is nevertheless demonstrable – that when believers let the ways of Jesus influence the way we act out towards others, and particularly those at the roadside of life, then it becomes clear for all to see that ‘the kingdom of God is among us’.

 

Notes

A fairly substantial rewrite of Bartimaeus: Believing is seeing, preached in Devon in 2012. With a  grateful nod towards Ched Myers, Binding the Strong Man: A Political Reading of Mark’s Story of Jesus, p.281ff

[1] Mark 7.15

[2] Mark 10.31

[3] Mark 10.35-45 

[4] Mark 10.17-27

[5] Matthew 5.3, Luke 6.20

 

The High Priest of Melchizedek in Fantasy meltdown

Hebrews 5.1-10, Mark 10.35-45

Queen Camel, Corton Denham, West Camel, Trinity 20 (Proper 24), 18/10/2015

 

‘Mankind is no more,

A casualty of the eternal war between angels and demons.

But in the realms where those beings dwell

Man still has one last hope:

The most feared of the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse,

Only Death can account for the sins of the past

And undo mankind’s extinction.

But – at what price?’ [1]

Recently I have been educating myself in the world of fantasy video gaming, an activity which engages a very large proportion of our population, especially the young, every day. And the words with which I opened come from a trailer advertising one popular game, Darksiders II, subtitled “Death Comes For All”.

The fantasy game world is a place of heroes and anti-heroes, who play out their combat as they move between layers of worlds upon worlds in a fast-flowing series of scenes. As you will have gathered from my opening, their characters and settings often draw on well-known myths and legends, on scripture, on folklore. But the scenarios are usually endless battles, played out over and over again, to gain and regain power of different sorts.

Each character tends to come from a particular class: a class that excels in combat, or magic, a professional or criminal class. The influential fantasy game Dungeons & Dragons features four classes of players: Fighting Men, Thieves, Wizards – and the Clerics, who specialise in healing and supportive magical abilities. [2]

There are numerous Priests in fantasy gaming. Final Fantasy is a role-playing video game franchise which has sold over 110 million units. In an online guide I read that the ‘Priests [in Final Fantasy] are physically weak and vulnerable, but their healing powers are quite significant. Their powerful Holy spell and … their curative magic … makes them offensively valuable.…’ [3]

Famous priests in the world of fantasy gaming include Nightcrawler, a superhero in the Marvel Comics X-Men series, and Father Markus Kane, in Fahrenheit, a paranormal thriller set in New York City. [4] The fantasy genre goes wider than games, of course. Look at the mainline TV schedules – Doctor Who, with its fantastic creatures from all manner of orders and worlds; and the massively popular Game of Thrones, whose Red Priests and Priestesses possess the power to bring people back to life. [5]

Why this interest in fantasy characters and their powers? It’s because, in revisiting the book of Hebrews, for today’s service, I was struck by the writer’s description of Jesus as The High Priest of the Order of Melchizedek – and my immediate thought was that that sounds like the name of a fantasy hero. What sort of character is The High Priest of the Order of Melchizedek; and what are his powers?

The Order of Melchizedek was the oldest and greatest of all Israel’s priestly lines. The Book of Genesis affirms that Melchizedek was “priest of God Most High” (Genesis 14:18). Abraham paid tithes to Melchizedek, while in the Psalms David pronounced that the future King of kings or Messiah was a “priest for ever after the order of Melchizedek.” (Psalm 110:1-4). The powers of this priestly order were the greatest of all priestly powers. You would want them on your side in any holy battle. The writer of Hebrews places Jesus at the pinnacle of this order, giving him the title High Priest. 

Now you may wonder, why take an interest in this obscure piece of scripture? And why talk about it in terms derived from present-day fantasy films and games? The reason is clear. It is to help us make connections with the interests and concerns of many people today, especially the young, for whom much of the Christian story, the story of God, is obscure at best, and needs explanation.

We are all missionaries, sharing our faith with the people we are called to share our lives with. And each generation of believers needs to find new ways of describing Jesus and the faith. Scripture is so rich that it contains all the stories, all the imagery we need. Some of these things are less potent than before – the notion of Jesus as the lamb who was slain is less relevant to us in a society where animal sacrifice is a thing of the past. 

Some previously obscure parts of scripture can be be reborn, recovered, to suit the interests and values of the times. The notion of Jesus as High Priest of the Order of Melchizedek might just be a way to connect with people obsessed by the world of fantasy. The character of his order, his personal powers, describe him well, in terms which gamers and film-watchers can relate to and understand.

Some time ago I visited the Harry Potter film studios in Leavesden, Hertfordshire. I think that it’s one of the most fantastic places I’ve ever been to – fantastic in every sense of that word. In a vast arena of full-size sets created for the series of fantasy films, I was overwhelmed by the scale, the craftsmanship, the creativity and above all the tremendous imagination which went into creating each set, each character, down to the tiniest details. I hadn’t even watched a Harry Potter film before visiting the studios but I was drawn into this wonderland, this world of creation.

One of the more modest displays on the tour featured a quote from Steve Kloves, one of the films’ screenwriters. Considering why the Harry Potter films appeal so much to their vast worldwide audiences, surprisingly he did not mention the wondrous sets and fantastic visuals: instead he spoke about their deeper appeal: ‘The thing about Potter,’ he said, ‘is that it’s very earnest about expressions of things like loyalty, courage and redemption. Audiences were hungry for that.’ [6]

Which suggests that beneath the thrill of fantasy gaming, those who take part are hoping to find something deeper in the scenarios they engage in, the characters they embrace. They are looking for values which they can take from the stories and apply in their ordinary lives, away from the screen.

Maybe some will find their search for deeper values met by Jesus the High Priest of the Order of Melchizedek, if we tell them about him. They will certainly find something unique. For of all the heroes of scripture, Jesus plays to a different set of rules. Though the writer of Hebrews pronounced him the future King of kings or Messiah, in the line of David, Jesus didn’t come as a king or rule as a messiah. 

The High Priest of the Order of Melchizedek  is not a cleric militant, not a crusader advancing the cause of righteousness with arms, armour, and magic. Mark’s gospel makes clear to us that though Jesus has these powers, he uses them in a unique way. He is the king who came ‘not to be served but to serve’; he is the messiah who ‘gave his life a ransom for many’. 

Jesus breaks the mould. He breaks the rules. If he was a character in an online game he would melt the computer down because he just would not co-operate with the rules of engagement. This is the great appeal of Jesus the High Priest of the Order of Melchizedek, not so much his absolute holy power, but the way he refused to use it in violence on others. His self-giving love breaks the cycle of death. Only he can do this. This is very good news in a world of violence, whose online games, TV dramas and big-screen fantasies trap us in a web from which it seems there is no escape – where we are consigned to play out endless battles, over and over again, to gain and regain power of different sorts. 

Young people are caught up in this because they are offered no alternative. Yet – as we have heard – some people involved in making films for them recognise that young people are hungering for values like loyalty, courage and redemption. Values such as those personified by The High Priest of the Order of Melchizedek. 

Point people towards Jesus and you point them to a whole new liberating way of life, in which the loving creator God enables you to live outside conflict, in generosity towards  others. In Darksiders II, we are told, ‘Death Comes For All’. But this is fantasy. In reality, Jesus comes for all. And he comes as a servant, he comes as a gift.

 

Notes

A slight rewrite of The High Priest of Melchizedek – hero for our times? first preached in Devon in 2012, and published in my collection, Devon Sermons.

[1] Soundtrack narrative from the Gameplay Trailer, Darksiders II – “Death Comes For All” <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IcO_byLhjWU>

[2] Wikipedia, Character class, Cleric.

[3] Caves of Narshe website, Final Fantasy Tactics Job Classes: Priest.

[4] Wikipedia, List of fictional clergy and religious figures: Priests.

[5] Game of Thrones Wikia: Red Priest.

[6] Steve Kloves quote from a display photographed at the Warner Brothers Studio Tour, London.

The land is sacred (2015)

Harvest Thanksgiving Services, 2015

West Camel, Sutton Montis, Corton Denham

Genesis 1, Psalm 8, and the following verses from Leviticus 25, 26, 31, Numbers 35, Exodus 20, Deuteronomy 5:

The Lord commands, ‘The land shall keep a Sabbath to the Lord;  every seventh day and every seventh year shall be a Sabbath for the Lord;  you will neither sow your fields nor prune your vineyard. If you obey my laws and keep my commandments, then I will reward you with rains in their season, and the land shall yield her produce and the trees of the field shall yield their fruit.  And I will give peace in the land.  If you remember that the land is sacred and you do not pollute nor defile the land on which you dwell, if you allow your beasts to rest and respect them and your servants, then you will prosper.’ 

‘Remember that the land is sacred’ – The idea that we walk on sacred ground is as unusual today as the idea that every seventh day should be a Sabbath. Unusual because the prevailing culture in which we live, driven by the unrelenting demands of capital, regards the land and time itself as resources to be mined, exploited, to exhaustion.

But when we look within, many of us are uneasy about this utilitarian view of land and time and life. Many of us feel deep within, a spirit in which life and time and land are special, are sacred. Perhaps that’s what brings you here today, for our harvest services and celebrations are special spaces in our year where we can voice our agreement that this land through which we move, this land on which we tread, is special to us, is sacred.

There are many reasons why we feel this way. This land is sacred to us because it is wonderful and beautiful in our eyes; it is sacred to us because events have taken place on it which have deeply affected our lives. The land is sacred to us because on it we have built special places in which to worship and offer thanksgiving; the land is sacred to us because in this soil we have buried our dead: on high ground in ancient barrows 5,000 years old, in churchyards, keeping them at the heart of our life of faith and eternal hope, and in wild flower meadows or woodlands today people return their departed back to nature – valuing the earth and their footprint on it. The land is sacred to us because in all these different ways we have buried our dead here.

The land carries other memories – of generations of farming in the one place; of significant journeys made often or perhaps just one special time. The land is sacred to us because events have taken place on it which have deeply affected our lives: we hold dear the places where we first met our loved one, where we enjoyed our schooling or learned our trade. We hold dear the places which are most beautiful to us, which constantly rewaken in us a sense of the sublime – the hillsides, the rivers, the forests, the sea shores.

And because the land is sacred to us we have built special places in which to worship and offer thanksgiving. The English countryside is full of churches built ‘to command respect and awe and draw the eye to the heavens’, as one writer puts it [1]. And a theologian, Martyn Percy, says that to the English people,

… the [parish] church itself is a sacrament – stone, glass and other materials, not to mention people – ordinary profane materials that God nevertheless blesses, imbues with his grace, beauty and holiness, and allows to be an outward sign that points to a spiritual and inward grace. The local church, just like the bread and the wine, can be God’s chosen broken material that reveals just something of his love for all. [2]

Our Methodist chapels and Quaker Meeting Houses mean the same to us – as do our synagogues, mosques and temples also – they hold our memories, they express our spirituality, they are signs of the sacred in our land, we build them and maintain them and come together in them at times like this to affirm that which is very deep within us, our sense of the sacredness of land and time and life. 

At the heart of the sense of the sacred character of the land is that it is not ours by right, it is a gift to us. At Harvest time we give voice to this in our songs, and our scriptures phrase what we feel in our hearts is the deeper story of our land:

And God said, “See, I have given you every plant yielding seed that is on the face of all the earth, and every tree with seed in its fruit. You shall have them for food. And to every beast of the earth and to every bird of the heavens and to everything that creeps on the earth, everything that has the breath of life, I have given every green plant for food.” And it was so. And God saw that it was good. (Genesis 1)

We remember that the land is sacred when we sense that it is given to us – by One who created it with care and generosity and joy. And when we take it as a gift, it fills us with a spirit which desires to treat the land with care and generosity and joy.

Our Harvest gatherings speak of something which endures – in the annual renewal of seedtime and harvest, cold and heat, summer and winter, day and night; in the land which is special to us, a landscape full of memory and history and spirit – what holds these things together and endures is the One who gives them to us and whose care and generosity and joy we celebrate and share.

 

Notes 

A shorter version of the sermon of the same title preached in Devon in 2012.

[1] Sue Clifford and Angela King, England in Particular, Churches, p.89 

[2] Martyn Percy, Shaping the Church: the Promise of Implicit Theology, p.63

Love comes blinking through the needle’s eye

Mark 10.17-31

Weston Bampfylde, Trinity 19 (Proper 23), 14/10/2012

 

‘It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for someone who is rich to enter the kingdom of God.’ Here’s Jesus is trying to be funny. We’d call it satire. Just like the satirical jokes we’ve been looking at together tonight. [2] 

CQsxX0dW8AATyp8

But the ‘camel through the eye of a needle’ joke was no joke to the rich man, who knew that in repeating it Jesus was echoing the dark humour of every poor man and woman in their society – a humour based on the reality that the rich were rich because (deliberately or not) they exploited and brought suffering on the poor. And Jesus said that if they continued to exploit and bring suffering on the poor then they would not enter the kingdom of heaven. 

‘You shall not defraud’, said Jesus, inserting a new commandment into the list he recited to the rich man. It meant, ‘You shall not keep back the wages of one of your contractors, you shall not refuse to return goods or money which someone has deposited with you for safekeeping’. Jesus was telling the man that the way he could make restitution would be by returning his wealth to the poor people, whom he has defrauded.

The rich man was looking for a God who would sanctify his lifestyle without requiring him to change it. The problem with the rich man’s God is that this is a God who allows other people to suffer. Conveniently ignoring the realities of the way he gains his wealth, his idea of God allows the rich man to believe that the suffering of the poor is caused by their own sinfulness. 

The rich man’s image of God compounds the suffering of the poor by permitting the accusation that the poor bring it on themselves, thus absolving him from any responsibility to others. His image of God extends the exploitation of nature by permitting the excuse that while the rich man may be consuming the earth’s resources, other people are doing it too, some people are doing it more, thus absolving him from any responsibility to reign in his overconsumption. 

It’s no joke, this attitude. And we may be feeling rather awkward about the rich man’s story, for we know that in absolute terms we are the rich today, in this wealthy part of the world – and we benefit from the mechanics of wealth creation just as the rich man did, from its economics and its theology. Even if we don’t mean it to, the wealth and ease of living we enjoy is at the expense of others, at the expense of the earth

52e2fed822690-preview-500

But God is not in the business of guilting us; in scripture it is Satan who is the accuser, God is the one who brings good news. [3] This story might make us feel awkward about our own relative wealth, but we shouldn’t feel condemned. Because this potent piece of scripture contains good news both for the poor and the rich.

This is the key: remember the reason Jesus told the rich man to sell up and give his money to the poor. He did it because, looking at the rich man, he loved him.

Now, this is a remarkable statement. This is the only place in Mark’s gospel where Jesus is said to have ‘loved’ someone. Jesus felt keenly, deeply, for the rich man in his situation. Jesus set the rich man his challenge because that was the loving thing to do. 

But how could that be? It makes no sense to us in our driven, acquisitive, privatised society where the compulsion to own and consume more and more for ourselves is just like the compulsion which drove Jesus’ rich man and his peers to grab more and more land, taxes and property from the poor. Surely, our culture says, the loving thing to do is to look after ourselves and our families first and forget the rest – not give away what we have to strangers.

But you may have heard of the concept of affluenza, a condition of our age defined as the ‘painful, contagious, socially transmitted condition of overload, debt, anxiety, and waste resulting from the dogged pursuit of more’. [4] And you may have read about the growing body of evidence that the countries with the greatest inequalities between rich and poor – countries like ours – are the most inefficient, unstable and suffering a serious breakdown in social cohesion and trust. [5] Releasing us from these burdens, is surely the loving thing to do.

As now, so then; Jesus sees the side-affects of wealth creation and his heart fills with love for a rich man lost, in search of release from all that harms his well-being, the deepest things which money cannot buy. Jesus wants to help the man turn away from a worldview, a theology, in which the rich man’s God props up an alienating lifestyle, Jesus longs to turn him towards another way of being altogether. He wants to turn him towards the God of love, whose love for him can release him from his own wealth addiction, into new, redeeming relationships with those others – the poor of the world – as he shares his life and wealth with them.

Polyp-cartoon-2

This has taken us all a long way from that quip about the camel and the eye of the needle. It’s not a joke any more, what Jesus is doing, but it is a wonder, it is a joy.

I was greatly challenged by a quote I read this week by the Franciscan friar and well-known author Richard Rohr, saying that,

Christians are usually sincere and well-intentioned people until you get to any real issues of ego, control power, money, pleasure, and security. Then they tend to be pretty much like everybody else. We are often given a bogus version of the Gospel, some fast-food religion, without any deep transformation of the self; and the result has been the spiritual disaster of ‘Christian’ countries that tend to be as consumer-oriented, proud, warlike, racist, class conscious, and addictive as everybody else-and often more so, I’m afraid. [6]

This uncomfortable quote, I think, links us in our time, and our dilemma, to the rich man in his time and the very same dilemma which he faced, and which he brought before Jesus. But then I read another great contemporary Christian writer and activist Jim Wallis, reflecting on the two commandments of Jesus which we hear each time we meet for Holy Communion – to love God and to love our neighbours,  [7] and this is what he writes, 

Christianity is not a religion that gives some people a ticket to heaven and makes them judgmental of all others. Rather, it’s a call to a relationship that changes all our other relationships. Jesus told us a new relationship with God also brings us into a new relationship with our neighbour, especially with the most vulnerable of this world, and even with our enemies. [8]

In loving the rich man, Jesus effectively called the rich man to love his neighbour, knowing that in so doing both would find life in its fulness. ‘This call to love our neighbour is the foundation for re-establishing and reclaiming the common good, which has fallen into … neglect.’ says Jim Wallis.

Now we might say that these are nice words, but an impossible task in these selfish, self-absorbed times. That’s what the disciples said to Jesus too. 

And Jesus looked at them and said, ‘For mortals it is impossible, but not for God; for God all things are possible.’ [9]

Praise the God who loves poor and rich alike, and who can liberate us from our addiction to wealth-creation and relentless consumerism, into relationships of quality, integrity, love, with others and with the earth.

 

Notes

[1] This talk uses core material from The rich man’s God or the God of the victims?, preached in Devon in October 2012. My exegesis of Mark owes a great deal to Ched Myers, Binding the Strong Man: a Political Reading of Mark’s Story of Jesus, p.271-276.

[2] The cartoons on this page, lifted from the internet, were handed out for the congregation’s amusement with the orders of service.

[3] See my Mark 8 – Satan the Accuser and God the Chooser, based on a sermon of the same title by Paul Neuchterlein.

[4] John de Graaf, David Wann & Thomas H. Naylor, Affluenza: The All-Consuming Epidemic, quoted in Wikipedia, Affluenza. With acknowledgement to Paul Neuchterlein’s sermon, Maybe this is Good News after all, delivered at Zion Lutheran, Racine, WI, October 15, 2000.

[5] Clare Bryden, Peril of eating all the pie, Church Times 12 October 2012, reviewing Joseph E. Stiglitz, The Price of Inequality.

[6]  Richard Rohr, Breathing Underwater: Spirituality and the 12 Steps, widely quoted online. 

[7] The Summary of the Law in the Book of Common Prayer.

[8] Jim Wallis, On God’s Side: What Religion Forgets and Politics Hasn’t Learned About Serving the Common Good, p.3/4.

[9] Mark 10.27.